Consenting for a Free Flap in the ST3 Plastics Interview

How to approach the free flap consent station in the ST3 Plastic Surgery interview: explaining microsurgery in lay terms, the risks that matter, and flap monitoring.

Published 10 July 2026

On this page
  1. How the station tends to run
  2. The approach that scores
  3. Where candidates lose marks
  4. Rehearse it
  5. Frequently asked questions

The consent station hands you a patient, not an examiner — often facing a radial forearm free flap for head-and-neck reconstruction — and marks how you translate a six-hour microsurgical operation into words a frightened person can hold onto.

How the station tends to run

You consent a patient (played by the examiner) for reconstruction after cancer resection — classically a radial forearm free flap for the floor of the mouth. After your explanation, the patient asks the questions real patients ask: how long is the operation, what if the flap fails, will my arm still work, will I eat normally, how long in hospital?

The approach that scores

Open like a clinician, not a script: confirm identity and the planned procedure, build rapport, check what they already understand, and acknowledge the weight of a cancer diagnosis before explaining anything.

Then explain the operation in genuinely lay terms, in two halves: the head-and-neck team removes the cancer; the plastics team borrows a patch of skin and its blood vessels from the forearm to fill the gap, joining those vessels to vessels in the neck under a microscope so the patch stays alive. The Allen test becomes: we first check the other artery at your wrist can supply your hand on its own.

  • Set expectations concretely: roughly six to ten hours with two teams working simultaneously; the first night on intensive care or HDU; possibly a temporary tracheostomy (explained in lay terms) and a feeding tube while the mouth heals; a skin graft from the thigh to close the forearm; seven to fourteen days in hospital.
  • Cover the risks that matter without burying the patient: flap failure (partial or total — around 2–5% — meaning urgent return to theatre or an alternative reconstruction), neck haematoma threatening the airway, infection, wound breakdown, scarring at three sites, forearm numbness and usually-temporary grip weakness, changes to speech and swallowing, DVT/PE, and nerve injury in the neck.
  • Explain monitoring as reassurance: the flap is checked every hour or two for the first two to three days — colour, warmth, blood flow — and a problem means going back to theatre promptly to save it.
  • Close the loop: speech and language therapy and dietetics in recovery, diet progressing from liquid to normal over weeks, and follow-up that watches both the cancer and the reconstruction.

Where candidates lose marks

Jargon is the station’s quiet killer — "anastomosis", "pedicle", and "fasciocutaneous" all need translating or dropping. So is a risk recital delivered as a list with no pauses: the station rewards dialogue, checking understanding, and honesty about uncertainty. And when the patient asks the feared question — what if it fails? — the strong answer is calm and concrete: it happens rarely, we watch closely, and if it does we return to theatre and have back-up options.

Rehearse it

Reading about consenting for a free flap is the easy half. Rehearse this exact scenario out loud, on the clock, with an AI examiner — this scenario is in Reviva’s library, with feedback marked the way the panel marks. Or start with the wider format in the st3 plastics consent station guide.

Frequently asked questions

How do you explain microsurgery to a patient in lay terms?
Something like: "we move a patch of skin with its own blood vessels from your forearm to your mouth, and re-join those tiny vessels to ones in your neck under a microscope, so the patch keeps its own blood supply and stays alive."
What flap failure rate should be quoted for a free flap?
Total failure is around 2–5%. Pair the number with the plan: intensive early monitoring, urgent return to theatre if the blood supply falters, and alternative reconstruction as the back-up.
What is the Allen test and why mention it in consent?
It checks that the ulnar artery alone can perfuse the hand before the radial artery is taken with the flap. In lay terms: "we make sure the other pipe to your hand is strong enough before borrowing this one."

Sources. Grounded in standard radial forearm free flap consent practice (two-team head-and-neck reconstruction, Allen test, flap monitoring, recognised complication profile) as rehearsed in Reviva’s ST3 plastics consent scenario. Educational only.